What is a portrait? National Galleries of Scotland senior paintings conservator, Lesley Stevenson describes a portrait as an 'evocation of that person'; it gives the sense of that person, but 'doesn't necessarily have to look like the person', but it would have to 'give some impression' (What is a portrait, 2011). In the same video, Senior Curator of the Scottish National Portrait Gallery, David Taylor describes a portrait as a 'depiction of a person which can be idealised to flatter them', or an 'impression' of their personality, or even an 'abstract depiction of some element about them'. The significant word here seems to be 'impression' and I tried to draw on this throughout the process of this portrait exercise. Going into it, I didn't have many creative ideas to make the project interesting. In the end, I just decided to do something that seemed true to me.
Something that is highly relevant to me
at the moment is the production of images. At no point did I consider
creating portraits that were not images, as I felt this would not
give the truest impression of me, and as 'impression' is the key I
felt that was the way to go.
As we have been learning, an image 'is
a sight which has been recreated or reproduced' (Berger, 2009, p9).
What, then, is a sight in which I would find myself? Each day I tried
to capture myself doing something different, but still unrehearsed
and unposed. The fact that the image is a reproduction renders this
'un-rehearsal' somewhat redundant as no matter what, the image will
never match reality in authenticity. But it's the thought that
counts.
MONDAY
Eating seemed like a good place to
start. If I'm not eating at any given moment in a day, chances are
I'll be thinking about eating. This seemed like the best way to
introduce myself in this durational piece. I had actually forgotten
about the project at this point and while eating dinner spontaneously
asked one of my housemates to snap these images immediately after
remembering, and I feel like this adds to realism of the images.
TUESDAY
Food again. But this time asking the
question, what goes into the preparation? I had not forgotten about
the the project this time, and wanted to incorporate the preparation
for this particular day, and as this was my first time making a pizza
from scratch I wanted to document my achievement (hence the end
result photo).
WEDNESDAY
This is where things get interesting. I
hadn't had any lightbulb ideas about an original concept for
Wednesday's portrait and was playing around on my phone when I
downloaded a GIF app, that allows users to easily create their own
GIFs. This is a demonstration of the kind of cinematic, nightmarish
imagery that floats around my head, just waiting to be put to film.
Dick Higgins spoke of the emergence of 'intermedia' (1978, p12) and I
think that GIFs are a current example of this, being work that falls
'between media'. In this example, between a still photograph and a
film. A silent film, as GIFs lack sound. It is purely visual ideas.
While the difference between the media being used is not as vast as
some other examples Higgins provides – such as general art media
and life media, a la Duchamp, or between sculpture and hamburgers in
Claes Oldenburg's works – it is the merging of two popular media
to create something different, in particular something that would not
exist without the internet.
THURSDAY
Another GIF. This time less conceptual,
and more practical. Homework and uni preparation are a huge part of
my week so it's important that these should feature in the
representation. This was the first portrait for the week taken by my
boyfriend who I thought would feature heavily in this project, and I
was curious to see how that would shape the outcome (i.e. would my
portraits reflect his view of me, rather than my view of me?).
However, it turned out that he would only play a bit part as he was
away most of the week and thus didn't have much of an impact, which I
must admit I was somewhat disappointed about.
FRIDAY
I had originally intended to capture a
moment when I was actually working,
but this seemed more true to my work experience at the moment as
we have all have a lot of fun together, and there is a lot of joking
around going on in order for us to make the time pass. In this
particular instance, our boss has taken this picture in which my
co-worker Robyn and I are pretending to be 'in a jar' that our boss
has put us in.
SATURDAY
The second image that Zac has captured.
He obviously took a lot of care in taking the photo. It just goes to
show, never trust a man with a beard. I liked how the image turned
out and decided to use it anyway.
SUNDAY
In today's lecture, Bindi Cole spoke of
the importance of family and community in general and in artistic
expression, and I'm very glad I got to include an element of family
in the representation, partly even just to ease the guilt I feel at
the irregular amount of time I am able to see them each week. But
they are incredibly important to me and have strongly shaped who I
am, and what there is to be represented as 'me' and so their
inclusion in the project is essential. Bindi's message may have been
more political than my own but the emotion behind the image is still
felt.
Overall, I feel these portraits give a
fairly accurate 'impression' of myself and my life. But I would be
interested to find out if those that know me would agree with this as
well. As an audience, are you aware that this photographer has
'select[ed] [these] sight[s] from an infinity of other possible
sights' (Berger, p10)?
REFERENCES
What is a portrait? 2011,
YouTube, National Galleries of Scotland, 28 November, retrieved 21
April 2013, < http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7exQDKFg0I >
Berger, J 2009 Ways of Seeing,
Penguin Classics, London, UK.
Higgins, D 1978, A Dialectic of
centuries: notes towards a theory of the new arts, Printed
Editions, New York.







No comments:
Post a Comment